This repo IS Atlas (总助 Claw / 老板视角项目执行雷达). The earlier
two-profile framing (Atlas + Vega placeholder) was a misread — Vega is
the agent persona answering Multica issues, not the product. Vega has
no relationship to assistant-claw the product.
Changes:
- Move atlas/* to top-level (git mv preserves history)
- Remove empty Vega placeholders prompts/.gitkeep, tools/.gitkeep
- Delete atlas/ wrapper directory (now empty)
- Update path references in INTEGRATION-hermes.md, scripts/mirror-...sh,
docs/decisions/0001-mirror-nuwa-skill.md
- Rewrite README.md as Atlas-only, remove dual-profile language
After this commit:
- Top-level OpenClaw 8 files (IDENTITY/SOUL/USER/AGENTS/TOOLS/MEMORY/
BOOTSTRAP/HEARTBEAT + CLAUDE symlink + zh-CN mirrors)
- skills/{6 sub-skills + DESCRIPTION + README}
- mcp-tools/{spec + Python implementation}
- state-schemas/{project, person, customer + README}
- autopilots/{5 atlas-*.yaml}
- client-deck/, docs/decisions/, scripts/
The ~/.hermes/skills/atlas/ destination convention preserved (atlas as
a skill namespace on the operator's machine, distinct from source path).
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| INPUT | ||
| OUTPUT | ||
| README.md | ||
claw-boss-distiller — Demo Run
A synthetic distillation, end-to-end, on a fictional 中国 SME 老板 "王总". Use this to:
- Show clients what
boss_skill.mdactually looks like before they commit - Validate the pipeline shape end-to-end before real client data arrives
- Smoke-test changes to
claw-boss-distiller(regression baseline)
Scenario
- Boss: 王总, founder + CEO of 一家约 80 人的企业服务公司 (toB SaaS), based in 上海
- Span: ~25 active projects, ~12 active customers, internal team of ~15 PMs/engineers/sales
- Email volume: ~40 incoming/day, ~20 outgoing/day
- Demo input: 10 boss-outgoing emails over a 14-day window (compressed sample; real distillation reads 6 months ≈ 2400+ emails)
- Languages: mostly 中文, occasional English term
Pipeline (matches SKILL.md and ADAPTER.md)
INPUT/wang-emails-*.txt (10 mock outgoing emails)
↓
[Bucket sort] classify each email into B1–B6
↓
[Triple verify] patterns must clear cross-domain + generative + exclusive
↓
[Synthesize 5 layers] Expression DNA / Mental Models / Decision Heuristics / Anti-Patterns / Honest Boundaries
↓
OUTPUT/boss_skill.demo.md (status: draft; awaits boss audit)
OUTPUT/run-summary.md (counts + verification trace)
Files
demo/
├── README.md # this file
├── INPUT/
│ ├── 01-催办-zhangsan-PRJ001.txt
│ ├── 02-决策-supplier-pick.txt
│ ├── 03-表扬-wang-onboarding.txt
│ ├── 04-否决-feature-request.txt
│ ├── 05-转交-li-customer-D.txt
│ ├── 06-mid-thread-intervention.txt
│ ├── 07-pressure-customer-A.txt
│ ├── 08-closing-PRJ022.txt
│ ├── 09-short-reply-FYI.txt
│ └── 10-long-reasoning-Q3-strategy.txt
└── OUTPUT/
├── boss_skill.demo.md # the produced 5-layer document
└── run-summary.md # the distillation log
How to read the demo
- Read 2–3 INPUT emails to get a feel for 王总's voice
- Read OUTPUT/boss_skill.demo.md and notice how each rule cites which input emails
- Read OUTPUT/run-summary.md to see which candidate patterns were promoted vs filtered out by triple verification
Caveats
- 10 emails is far below the real W1 corpus size. Real runs produce richer Expression DNA and more decision heuristics.
- 王总 is fictional; any resemblance to real bosses is coincidental.
- The demo deliberately includes one ambiguous case (email #4) to show how the pipeline marks
low_confidence.